<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: </title>
	<atom:link href="https://mm.soldat.pl/development-log/1187/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://mm.soldat.pl/development-log/1187</link>
	<description>Michał Marcinkowski&#039;s: Gamedev Log &#38; Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 04:51:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: VanBurgler</title>
		<link>https://mm.soldat.pl/development-log/1187/comment-page-1#comment-168596</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VanBurgler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mm.soldat.pl/development-log/1187#comment-168596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to: http://lwn.net/Articles/167897/
Linux kernels 2.6.16 and higher support nanosecond resolution time using hrtimer

According to: http://www.songho.ca/misc/timer/timer.html
gettimeofday() _should_ give microsecond resolution time and the only report I have seen it return less than microsecond was on an embedded processor]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to: <a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/167897/" rel="nofollow">http://lwn.net/Articles/167897/</a><br />
Linux kernels 2.6.16 and higher support nanosecond resolution time using hrtimer</p>
<p>According to: <a href="http://www.songho.ca/misc/timer/timer.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.songho.ca/misc/timer/timer.html</a><br />
gettimeofday() _should_ give microsecond resolution time and the only report I have seen it return less than microsecond was on an embedded processor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toumaz</title>
		<link>https://mm.soldat.pl/development-log/1187/comment-page-1#comment-168572</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toumaz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 11:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mm.soldat.pl/development-log/1187#comment-168572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[gettimeofday(), generally, but accuracy doesn&#039;t go past milliseconds on all systems, sadly.

also if you&#039;re intending to use QueryPerformanceCounter be sure to read this: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/274323

this might be helpful, too, for reference&#039;s sake: http://www.stlsoft.org/doc-1.9/classplatformstl_1_1performance__counter.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gettimeofday(), generally, but accuracy doesn&#8217;t go past milliseconds on all systems, sadly.</p>
<p>also if you&#8217;re intending to use QueryPerformanceCounter be sure to read this: <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/274323" rel="nofollow">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/274323</a></p>
<p>this might be helpful, too, for reference&#8217;s sake: <a href="http://www.stlsoft.org/doc-1.9/classplatformstl_1_1performance__counter.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.stlsoft.org/doc-1.9/classplatformstl_1_1performance__counter.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
