Comments on:

By: MM

MM — Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:39:55 +0000

Would it slow you down to manage two releases?

Not at all. The dev release would just be the release I am currently working on.
I’m gonna do this, this week for sure.

By: NooMoahk

NooMoahk — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:30:15 +0000

Would it slow you down to manage two releases?

By: White Bear

White Bear — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:05:47 +0000

so there would be two releases?
Devalpha (what might give players release that doesn’t even load)
Pubalpha (what is last stable release)
I don’t mind at all new features and more up to date bug hunting will work just fine. Right now If I found bug I would probably repeat someone else. If Devalpha is released more often then you will profit more from bug reports.

By: illu

illu — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 20:24:19 +0000

Me agrees too.
So you could “finish the Nuclear Plant map & draw guides for the new features” while we try the test release and bombard you with tons of found bugs! 😛

The public release could be delayed then of course if you then decide to fix most of the bugs first.

By: Underline

Underline — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:46:45 +0000

fgg02: I would love that even more. This would be a really cool addition and another step in sharing the development with us.

I agree.

By: fgg02

fgg02 — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:28:12 +0000

… dont mind last comment, I did not understand.

I would love that even more. This would be a really cool addition and another step in sharing the development with us.

By: fgg02

fgg02 — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:25:20 +0000

Please do :). I want to play this !

I couldnt mind less about explanation.

Also, I know you are selling this alpha, but games in alpha stage rarely come with a guide… So no one should be offended.