Comments on:

By: danyukhin

danyukhin — Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:05:06 +0000

Yup. Agree with the guys, there must be WARS, and not just battles. Like, planned, cooperated, long-lasting, where every loss is important, and at least 150 players on one serv. I know I’m asking too much, but hey man, it’s my birthday, no less=)

By: MM

MM — Sun, 26 Jul 2009 09:37:59 +0000

I don’t think ID worked on deadlines in those times. They had time to think.

By: whitdemon

whitdemon — Sat, 25 Jul 2009 23:52:56 +0000

that would mean real WAR! bring it in!

By: TLD

TLD — Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:45:17 +0000

mm just make sure it support over 1000+ players per game lol, atleast u got enough players to make the 15 x 15 screen maps fun

By: Diego

Diego — Sat, 25 Jul 2009 15:50:36 +0000

Remember Michale in design or video game making “Less is more” this means the more simple the code can be, the more it will work for a long time.

By: hmm

hmm — Sat, 25 Jul 2009 14:54:46 +0000

Of course you can. Carmack, thogugh ID’s co-owner has some real deadlines and you don’t.

By: Underline

Underline — Sat, 25 Jul 2009 13:34:31 +0000

Do the simple, after the simple is working, improve it.

By: MM

MM — Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:48:57 +0000

Yes that’s the fun of multiplayer games isn’t it!?

By: archont

archont — Sat, 25 Jul 2009 11:44:10 +0000

You mean better at losing data, desychronizing clients, hogging memory and crashing?

I believe you can!