Comments on:

By: mman

mman — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:43:31 +0000

well your dust wont make up for good sparks and other fancy stuff

By: curious

curious — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:23:14 +0000

this wordpress thing is stupid

By: MM

MM — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:16:35 +0000

The particle engine is not designed for being visually impressive. I have the dust processor for that. It is built for speed. I want to have 10000’s of flying objects in the game.

isn’t this your third particle engine so far?
Good counting :). I’ve gotten good at it, I can make a particle engine in 1 day.

By: niko šveikovsky

niko šveikovsky — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:02:38 +0000

isn’t this your third particle engine so far?

By: Sinpol

Sinpol — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:57:40 +0000

What resolution will the game?
in previous videos that showed the effects of smoke, took too long to dissipate. the truth is that it only looks bad the dust produced when walking, that take long to dissipate. The shooting and grenades give it does not matter much emotion to play with light effects and flashes =)

By: mman

mman — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:46:40 +0000

tell something more, im into particle engines and i’d love to see more variety in effects u can make with it then in mine.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:30:38 +0000

a lot of bullet shells sounds great. Will there still be boxes and other pysic objects you can use?

By: curious

curious — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:17:48 +0000

wtf